222 Luke xiv. 14.
[There are some footnotes missing, and the rest seem to be out of sync]
223 Luke xix. 10.
224 Rom. v. 20.
225 John vi. 38.
228 John xx. 29.
229 Matt. x. 28.
230 Tertullian supposed that even the soul was in a certain sense of a corporeal essence. [Compare the speculations of Crusius in Auberlen, Divine Revelation, (Translation of A.B. Paton, Edinburgh, Clarks, 1867).]
232 Matt. x. 29.
234 Matt. x. 30.
235 John vi. 39.
236 Matt. viii. 12, xiii. 42, xxii. 13, xxv. 30.
237 Compare Tertullian's De Proescript. Hoeret. c. xxxiii.
238 Matt. xxii. 23-32; Mark xii. 18-27; Luke xx. 27-38.
239 Luke xx. 37.
242 John vi. 63.
243 John v. 24.
244 John i. 14.
245 John vi. 51.
247 John v. 25.
248 The divine nature of the Son. See our Anti-Marcion, pp. 129, 247, note 7, Edin.
249 John v. 28, 29.
251 Rev. vi. 9-11.
252 Tertullian always refers to this book by a plural phrase.
256 Acts xxiii. 6.
257 Acts xxvi. 22.
258 Gen. ix. 5, 6.
259 Acts xvii. 32.
260 1 Cor. xi. 19.
261 2 Cor. iv. 16.
264 Eph. iii. 17.
267 2 Cor. vii. 5.
269 2 Cor. v. 1.
270 Matt. v. 10.
271 John xiv. 2.
272 2 Cor. v. 2, 3.
273 Compendio mortis. Compare our Anti-Marcion for the same thoughts and words, v. 12. [p. 455, supra.]
276 Comp. Matt. v. 26, and see Tertullian's De Anima, xxxv. [and see cap. xliii., infra, p. 576.]
280 2 Cor. v. 4. [Against Marcion, p. 455, note 24.]
281 Exuti. He must have read e0kdusa/menoi, instead of the reading of nearly all the ms. authorities, e0ndusa/menoi.
282 2 Cor. v. 3.
283 2 Cor. v. 6, 7.
285 Comp. his De Anima, c. lv. [Elucidation III.]
286 2 Cor. v. 9, 10.
287 2 Cor. v. 10.